<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Zoom H4n audio sample	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bradlinder.net/2009/01/zoom-h4n-audio-sample.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bradlinder.net/2009/01/zoom-h4n-audio-sample.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2016 16:18:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Monstersax		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2009/01/zoom-h4n-audio-sample.html#comment-80</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Monstersax]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 09:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=89#comment-80</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That recording was done at the NAMM show using the H2n.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That recording was done at the NAMM show using the H2n.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2009/01/zoom-h4n-audio-sample.html#comment-393</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=89#comment-393</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I bought the H4N and I am very satisfied with it&lt;br /&gt;this is a quick recording from it, I used the multi-record track mode and used my shure Beta 57a phantom mic to record my vocals which I recorded in my truck thanks to the portability of this unit, recorded my guitar direct line and then recorded guitar with the H4N mics.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I made this for my Wife.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;www.wix.com/xesecre/KARY]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought the H4N and I am very satisfied with it<br />this is a quick recording from it, I used the multi-record track mode and used my shure Beta 57a phantom mic to record my vocals which I recorded in my truck thanks to the portability of this unit, recorded my guitar direct line and then recorded guitar with the H4N mics.</p>
<p>I made this for my Wife.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wix.com/xesecre/KARY" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.wix.com/xesecre/KARY</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2009/01/zoom-h4n-audio-sample.html#comment-394</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=89#comment-394</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hello&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;m sorry to disagree with you guys, but I feel someone should give an other perspective, for potential buyers reading this. To my ears the H4n is a decent recorder, but sounds somehow hollow and thin&#039; also the preamps are not something I would happy to use, lack of definition, overly bright and too sterile. I would NOT call it&#039;s audio recording quality stellar or pristine as some people commented in any way. I&#039;m sure for many people it is good enough and for sure gives you a lot for what it costs, but I feel it still leaves a lot to be desired in the audio department.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I am an audio engineer and I always look for the best possible audio quality first, even for a low cost machine like this one, and then features, and I just felt someone had to put the record straight on this one...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;George]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello</p>
<p>I&#39;m sorry to disagree with you guys, but I feel someone should give an other perspective, for potential buyers reading this. To my ears the H4n is a decent recorder, but sounds somehow hollow and thin&#39; also the preamps are not something I would happy to use, lack of definition, overly bright and too sterile. I would NOT call it&#39;s audio recording quality stellar or pristine as some people commented in any way. I&#39;m sure for many people it is good enough and for sure gives you a lot for what it costs, but I feel it still leaves a lot to be desired in the audio department.</p>
<p>I am an audio engineer and I always look for the best possible audio quality first, even for a low cost machine like this one, and then features, and I just felt someone had to put the record straight on this one&#8230;</p>
<p>George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2009/01/zoom-h4n-audio-sample.html#comment-516</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 03:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=89#comment-516</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;I have the H4N. It seems great.&lt;/b&gt;It is a truly beautiful piece of equipment. With all the features it has and the price being $439 (In Canada) it is a far better deal than the others in its class. It sounds great to me - Im no expert.&lt;br /&gt;I have tried it with a studio mike and a Sure SM58, inside, outside, in vehicles the works and it works great. When I record ambient sounds in a room, then play it back on my headphones its so clear and real that I find myself answering someone I hear on the recording. &lt;a&gt;Its that clear!&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I have the H4N. It seems great.</b>It is a truly beautiful piece of equipment. With all the features it has and the price being $439 (In Canada) it is a far better deal than the others in its class. It sounds great to me &#8211; Im no expert.<br />I have tried it with a studio mike and a Sure SM58, inside, outside, in vehicles the works and it works great. When I record ambient sounds in a room, then play it back on my headphones its so clear and real that I find myself answering someone I hear on the recording. <a>Its that clear!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2009/01/zoom-h4n-audio-sample.html#comment-672</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 23:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=89#comment-672</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This machine lost to mighty Sony pcmd50.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This machine lost to mighty Sony pcmd50.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2009/01/zoom-h4n-audio-sample.html#comment-744</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=89#comment-744</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[artocignus &lt;br/&gt;check this blog for your answer.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://www.bradlinder.net/2009/03/zoom-h4n-audio-take-2-second-time-not.html]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>artocignus <br />check this blog for your answer.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bradlinder.net/2009/03/zoom-h4n-audio-take-2-second-time-not.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.bradlinder.net/2009/03/zoom-h4n-audio-take-2-second-time-not.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2009/01/zoom-h4n-audio-sample.html#comment-761</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 14:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=89#comment-761</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[no idea m8. just listen to the above samples. lol]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no idea m8. just listen to the above samples. lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: artocignus		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2009/01/zoom-h4n-audio-sample.html#comment-762</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[artocignus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 22:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=89#comment-762</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Can anyone tell me which would be the best for recording live classical music, the Zoom H4n or the Fostex FR2-LE? Opinions are unanimously positive about the Fostex, but it&#039;s quite a bit more expensive than the H4n and the H4n also hasn&#039;t been out that long, so less has been written about it. How do the new and better preamps of the H4n compare to those of the Fostex?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone tell me which would be the best for recording live classical music, the Zoom H4n or the Fostex FR2-LE? Opinions are unanimously positive about the Fostex, but it&#8217;s quite a bit more expensive than the H4n and the H4n also hasn&#8217;t been out that long, so less has been written about it. How do the new and better preamps of the H4n compare to those of the Fostex?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2009/01/zoom-h4n-audio-sample.html#comment-765</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=89#comment-765</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[FYI this product is not H2N its H4N.  Listen to the samples carefully. It does seem a decent, easy to use recorder.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI this product is not H2N its H4N.  Listen to the samples carefully. It does seem a decent, easy to use recorder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: @man		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2009/01/zoom-h4n-audio-sample.html#comment-766</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[@man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=89#comment-766</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The buzz on this has been terrific, but it seems that reviewers all got a peek at it in early January, and nobody has had a chance to use it. So I wait for something that looks like an objective review. I have used the H2, and the user interface is awkward, to put it mildly. Does the H2N, with all the extra buttons and larger screen, make big improvements on the UI? And are the preamps really so good? Et c. I see today that vendors finally have it in stock. I hope to see more reviews soon.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The buzz on this has been terrific, but it seems that reviewers all got a peek at it in early January, and nobody has had a chance to use it. So I wait for something that looks like an objective review. I have used the H2, and the user interface is awkward, to put it mildly. Does the H2N, with all the extra buttons and larger screen, make big improvements on the UI? And are the preamps really so good? Et c. I see today that vendors finally have it in stock. I hope to see more reviews soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: bradlinder.net @ 2025-11-01 03:34:51 by W3 Total Cache
-->