<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Marantz PMD661 digital recorder now shipping	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bradlinder.net/2008/12/marantz-pmd661-digital-recorder-now-shipping.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bradlinder.net/2008/12/marantz-pmd661-digital-recorder-now-shipping.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:11:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ghendrick		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2008/12/marantz-pmd661-digital-recorder-now-shipping.html#comment-111</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ghendrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=99#comment-111</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have owned a Sony PCM-D50 for a few years.  I recently had a chance to use &#038; compare it against a Marantz PMD661.  I wanted to like the PMD661...  I really tried to like it... But I just can&#039;t recommend it.   While I like the fact that the Marantz has built in XLR connectors &#038; phantom power... The 661 falls short in several key features for me:  My main problem with this 661 is the headphone amp is NOT ADEQUATE to monitor &#038; playback your recordings with enough volume to be useful.  If you can&#039;t hear the background noise in the headphones you can&#039;t make decent recordings.  My second complaint about the 661 is the fact it has NO limiter feature whatsoever.  Furthermore the mic preamp seems to clip rather nastily.   The 5 hour battery life is not great compared with the outstanding Sony PCM-D50&#034; 25 hour run time.  The microphones in the PMD661 are also inferior to the Sony PCM-50D.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Despite the fact that this PMD661 has XLR inputs...  I much prefer the Sony PCM-D50 with an XLR adapter.  (Such as those made by BeachTek)  The PCM-D50 has a much better headphone amp, better mics built in, a very useful limiter and slightly better mic pre-amps in my opinion.  The Sony is also about $200 LESS expensive and built like a tank. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have owned a Sony PCM-D50 for a few years.  I recently had a chance to use &amp; compare it against a Marantz PMD661.  I wanted to like the PMD661&#8230;  I really tried to like it&#8230; But I just can&#39;t recommend it.   While I like the fact that the Marantz has built in XLR connectors &amp; phantom power&#8230; The 661 falls short in several key features for me:  My main problem with this 661 is the headphone amp is NOT ADEQUATE to monitor &amp; playback your recordings with enough volume to be useful.  If you can&#39;t hear the background noise in the headphones you can&#39;t make decent recordings.  My second complaint about the 661 is the fact it has NO limiter feature whatsoever.  Furthermore the mic preamp seems to clip rather nastily.   The 5 hour battery life is not great compared with the outstanding Sony PCM-D50&quot; 25 hour run time.  The microphones in the PMD661 are also inferior to the Sony PCM-50D.</p>
<p>Despite the fact that this PMD661 has XLR inputs&#8230;  I much prefer the Sony PCM-D50 with an XLR adapter.  (Such as those made by BeachTek)  The PCM-D50 has a much better headphone amp, better mics built in, a very useful limiter and slightly better mic pre-amps in my opinion.  The Sony is also about $200 LESS expensive and built like a tank. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Marantz PMD661 Newbie		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2008/12/marantz-pmd661-digital-recorder-now-shipping.html#comment-816</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marantz PMD661 Newbie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=99#comment-816</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Now shipping in the UK too. Just put an order in for mine from here http://www.aandcaudio.co.uk/marantz-pmd661-digital-audio-recorder-free-2gb-card-p112185 and came with a 2gb card free. Can&#039;t complain! Neil S.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now shipping in the UK too. Just put an order in for mine from here <a href="http://www.aandcaudio.co.uk/marantz-pmd661-digital-audio-recorder-free-2gb-card-p112185" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.aandcaudio.co.uk/marantz-pmd661-digital-audio-recorder-free-2gb-card-p112185</a> and came with a 2gb card free. Can&#8217;t complain! Neil S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: steve smart		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2008/12/marantz-pmd661-digital-recorder-now-shipping.html#comment-818</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steve smart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 07:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=99#comment-818</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I just bought the new Marantz PMD661 at a place called Martel Electronics. They included 2 free mics with the order. check it out http://www.martelelectronics.com/Marantz-PMD661.html They had them in stock. Steve]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just bought the new Marantz PMD661 at a place called Martel Electronics. They included 2 free mics with the order. check it out <a href="http://www.martelelectronics.com/Marantz-PMD661.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.martelelectronics.com/Marantz-PMD661.html</a> They had them in stock. Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2008/12/marantz-pmd661-digital-recorder-now-shipping.html#comment-825</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=99#comment-825</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On paper (which is never a good way to evaluate audio gear), the 661&#039;s performance specs looks pretty similar (noisy) to the 660 -- I hope the better mic pre&#039;s mentioned in the video aren&#039;t just lip service!  If they&#039;ve fixed the noise, this will be a great unit.  I love the performance of Fostex&#039;s FR-2LE but am put off by it&#039;s size; if the new Marantz can match it, they&#039;ll have a winner.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On paper (which is never a good way to evaluate audio gear), the 661&#8217;s performance specs looks pretty similar (noisy) to the 660 &#8212; I hope the better mic pre&#8217;s mentioned in the video aren&#8217;t just lip service!  If they&#8217;ve fixed the noise, this will be a great unit.  I love the performance of Fostex&#8217;s FR-2LE but am put off by it&#8217;s size; if the new Marantz can match it, they&#8217;ll have a winner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: bradlinder.net @ 2025-10-30 21:51:22 by W3 Total Cache
-->