https://bradlinder.net/2008/11/marantz-pmd661-is-smaller-newer-than-pmd660.html Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:35:01 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3 https://bradlinder.net/2008/11/marantz-pmd661-is-smaller-newer-than-pmd660.html#comment-391 Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:35:01 +0000 http://bradlinder.net/?p=104#comment-391 Got 2 free balanced microphone free. http://www.martelelectronics.com/Marantz-PMD661.html They also had them instock. Super Deal.

]]> https://bradlinder.net/2008/11/marantz-pmd661-is-smaller-newer-than-pmd660.html#comment-828 Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:57:29 +0000 http://bradlinder.net/?p=104#comment-828 12/16/08: Just got an email from SweetWater.com notifying me that this in in stock for $599.

]]> https://bradlinder.net/2008/11/marantz-pmd661-is-smaller-newer-than-pmd660.html#comment-838 Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:24:57 +0000 http://bradlinder.net/?p=104#comment-838 This might be just the thing for some of my live event recordings… we’ve been using m-audio microtracks but haven’t been happy with them of late. Any idea if it will be able to accept line level (+4DbU) on it’s XLR inputs, I can always add a couple of pads, but i’d rather not.

]]> https://bradlinder.net/2008/11/marantz-pmd661-is-smaller-newer-than-pmd660.html#comment-839 Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:14:54 +0000 http://bradlinder.net/?p=104#comment-839 Now, this is what I have been talking about. Maybe it will review well, and I can finally have my setup for world domina… I mean, “field recording.”

]]> https://bradlinder.net/2008/11/marantz-pmd661-is-smaller-newer-than-pmd660.html#comment-841 Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:51:52 +0000 http://bradlinder.net/?p=104#comment-841 You forgot to mention an important upgrade: it’s now 24/96 capable. That was really one of the biggest drawbacks of the 660 more recently. That said, looks like they kept those crappy meters, oh well.

]]>