<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: O&#8217;Reilly reviews the Yamaha Pocketrak 2G	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bradlinder.net/2008/10/oreilly-reviews-the-yamaha-pocketrak-2g.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bradlinder.net/2008/10/oreilly-reviews-the-yamaha-pocketrak-2g.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:08:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: David Battino		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2008/10/oreilly-reviews-the-yamaha-pocketrak-2g.html#comment-873</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Battino]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=108#comment-873</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[While editing Mark&#039;s review, I started to wonder if the Pocketrak 2G is a rebadged Olympus voice recorder. The design and file system certainly look similar. And Olympus recently announced the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_section/product.asp?product=1399&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;DS-71&lt;/a&gt;, a model that records in WAV format. &lt;i&gt;And &lt;/i&gt;the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.yamahasynth.com/products/pocketrakcx/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pocketrak CX&lt;/a&gt;, mentioned in the review, looks an awful lot like the Olympus LS-10.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Theories aside, I&#039;m a fan of stereo voice recorders. Like camera phones, they&#039;re always ready to capture an interesting event. But the ear is more forgiving than the eye, I think, so many of my voice recorder &quot;snapshots&quot; have ended up in real productions.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While editing Mark&#8217;s review, I started to wonder if the Pocketrak 2G is a rebadged Olympus voice recorder. The design and file system certainly look similar. And Olympus recently announced the <a href="http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_section/product.asp?product=1399" rel="nofollow">DS-71</a>, a model that records in WAV format. <i>And </i>the <a href="http://www.yamahasynth.com/products/pocketrakcx/index.html" rel="nofollow">Pocketrak CX</a>, mentioned in the review, looks an awful lot like the Olympus LS-10.</p>
<p>Theories aside, I&#8217;m a fan of stereo voice recorders. Like camera phones, they&#8217;re always ready to capture an interesting event. But the ear is more forgiving than the eye, I think, so many of my voice recorder &#8220;snapshots&#8221; have ended up in real productions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: bradlinder.net @ 2025-10-30 21:51:23 by W3 Total Cache
-->