<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: A short review of the Tascam DR-1	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bradlinder.net/2008/06/a-short-review-of-the-tascam-dr-1.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bradlinder.net/2008/06/a-short-review-of-the-tascam-dr-1.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 22:31:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2008/06/a-short-review-of-the-tascam-dr-1.html#comment-248</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 16:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=124#comment-248</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve owned this recorder for almost a year now.  Totally impressed with its warm sound and loss hiss.  I record loud concerts and use the LINE-IN.  The Pre/ADC is this puppy is top notch.  I ditched the original Edirol R09 because I thought the DR-1 sounded much, much better.  The biggest test was recording direct from a Soundboard and it handled it great!  No crackling in the SBD recording at all.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Only con:  Needs an auto increment recording feature for when a file hits 2GB limit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve owned this recorder for almost a year now.  Totally impressed with its warm sound and loss hiss.  I record loud concerts and use the LINE-IN.  The Pre/ADC is this puppy is top notch.  I ditched the original Edirol R09 because I thought the DR-1 sounded much, much better.  The biggest test was recording direct from a Soundboard and it handled it great!  No crackling in the SBD recording at all.</p>
<p>Only con:  Needs an auto increment recording feature for when a file hits 2GB limit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2008/06/a-short-review-of-the-tascam-dr-1.html#comment-567</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 01:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=124#comment-567</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As for the 2GB limit: OS 2.0 solves this problem, as well as introducinng some nice features.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for the 2GB limit: OS 2.0 solves this problem, as well as introducinng some nice features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2008/06/a-short-review-of-the-tascam-dr-1.html#comment-568</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=124#comment-568</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been using this recorder for some months, now, and I love how clean and cleaar it is when using the internal mics for capturing soundscapes and university lecturers.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Yesterday I used it with the CMC-8 mini-mics sold by Sound Professionals (based on the ES943 capsules) and an external 9V battery module, and I was really surprised to see how clean it sounded, and how well it could manage dynamics of sounds as different as solo instruments (piano, sax, cello...), a chamber orchestra and a powerful wind orchestra.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;No distorsion at all, no hiss, and a perfect handling of dynamics. And the resulting sound was also warm and &quot;very musical&quot;.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Paolo]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using this recorder for some months, now, and I love how clean and cleaar it is when using the internal mics for capturing soundscapes and university lecturers.</p>
<p>Yesterday I used it with the CMC-8 mini-mics sold by Sound Professionals (based on the ES943 capsules) and an external 9V battery module, and I was really surprised to see how clean it sounded, and how well it could manage dynamics of sounds as different as solo instruments (piano, sax, cello&#8230;), a chamber orchestra and a powerful wind orchestra.</p>
<p>No distorsion at all, no hiss, and a perfect handling of dynamics. And the resulting sound was also warm and &#8220;very musical&#8221;.</p>
<p>Paolo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2008/06/a-short-review-of-the-tascam-dr-1.html#comment-808</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 02:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=124#comment-808</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve owned this recorder for almost a year now.  Totally impressed with its warm sound and loss hiss.  I record loud concerts and use the LINE-IN.  The Pre/ADC is this puppy is top notch.  I ditched the original Edirol R09 because I thought the DR-1 sounded much, much better.  The biggest test was recording direct from a Soundboard and it handled it great!  No crackling in the SBD recording at all.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Only con:  Needs an auto increment recording feature for when a file hits 2GB limit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve owned this recorder for almost a year now.  Totally impressed with its warm sound and loss hiss.  I record loud concerts and use the LINE-IN.  The Pre/ADC is this puppy is top notch.  I ditched the original Edirol R09 because I thought the DR-1 sounded much, much better.  The biggest test was recording direct from a Soundboard and it handled it great!  No crackling in the SBD recording at all.</p>
<p>Only con:  Needs an auto increment recording feature for when a file hits 2GB limit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2008/06/a-short-review-of-the-tascam-dr-1.html#comment-866</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 07:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=124#comment-866</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hmm..  I know I&#039;m late in this several-month-old chain, but I have to point out anyway that you have to have an impedence-matched xlr to 1/4 adapter, otherwise you lose out since you can&#039;t just run an xlr signal into a 1/4 jack because of different impedences.  The sales rep at some store told me that when I purchased it.  It&#039;s true.  The adapters have a little transformer in them to drive the input impedence into the output.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm..  I know I&#8217;m late in this several-month-old chain, but I have to point out anyway that you have to have an impedence-matched xlr to 1/4 adapter, otherwise you lose out since you can&#8217;t just run an xlr signal into a 1/4 jack because of different impedences.  The sales rep at some store told me that when I purchased it.  It&#8217;s true.  The adapters have a little transformer in them to drive the input impedence into the output.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: synthetic		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2008/06/a-short-review-of-the-tascam-dr-1.html#comment-912</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[synthetic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=124#comment-912</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s no power on the 1/4&quot; jack because it&#039;s a stereo jack. If there was power it would have to be mono, right? &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I haven&#039;t had any problems with using internal or external mics on mine, I thin it sounds incredible. It does really well with loud sources like concerts, especially with the analog peak limiter turned on. I&#039;ve used the Zoom but much prefer this recorder.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no power on the 1/4&#8243; jack because it&#8217;s a stereo jack. If there was power it would have to be mono, right? </p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t had any problems with using internal or external mics on mine, I thin it sounds incredible. It does really well with loud sources like concerts, especially with the analog peak limiter turned on. I&#8217;ve used the Zoom but much prefer this recorder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: peet sneekes		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2008/06/a-short-review-of-the-tascam-dr-1.html#comment-914</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[peet sneekes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 08:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=124#comment-914</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I know them both, but I jumped to conclusions because the 620 is more in the league of the DR-1 than the  660 (size and feature wise).&lt;br/&gt;I do like the XLR&#039;s on the 660 though. I never got why they can&#039;t fit a couple (or even one) XLR - TRS  combo&#039;s on the compact recorders. Yeah I know, space.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know them both, but I jumped to conclusions because the 620 is more in the league of the DR-1 than the  660 (size and feature wise).<br />I do like the XLR&#8217;s on the 660 though. I never got why they can&#8217;t fit a couple (or even one) XLR &#8211; TRS  combo&#8217;s on the compact recorders. Yeah I know, space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brad Linder		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2008/06/a-short-review-of-the-tascam-dr-1.html#comment-921</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad Linder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 20:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=124#comment-921</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nope. The Marantz PMD620 is a handheld recorder with 1/8th inch inputs. the PMD660 is a more expensive unit with 2 XLR inputs.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope. The Marantz PMD620 is a handheld recorder with 1/8th inch inputs. the PMD660 is a more expensive unit with 2 XLR inputs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Peet Sneekes		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2008/06/a-short-review-of-the-tascam-dr-1.html#comment-922</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peet Sneekes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 20:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=124#comment-922</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure here, but are you referring to the Marantz PMD 620 when you mention the PMD 660?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure here, but are you referring to the Marantz PMD 620 when you mention the PMD 660?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: bradlinder.net @ 2025-10-29 15:04:51 by W3 Total Cache
-->