<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Comparison of upcoming digital audio recorders	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bradlinder.net/2008/01/comparison-of-upcoming-digital-audio-recorders.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bradlinder.net/2008/01/comparison-of-upcoming-digital-audio-recorders.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 16:18:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Googoogaagaa		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2008/01/comparison-of-upcoming-digital-audio-recorders.html#comment-134</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Googoogaagaa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 16:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=161#comment-134</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There&#039;s a mistake in the chart: the Tascam DR-1 goes up to 48kHz, not 96.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>There&#39;s a mistake in the chart: the Tascam DR-1 goes up to 48kHz, not 96.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2008/01/comparison-of-upcoming-digital-audio-recorders.html#comment-518</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=161#comment-518</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have both an Olympus LS-10 and DS-5000. I&#039;ve used both to record meetings but the DS-5000 is far superior to the LS-10, particularly because of the conference setting. It&#039;s a bit pricey though. Really, anything in the DS series are ideal for meetings. I would recommend the DS-40, 61 or 71]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have both an Olympus LS-10 and DS-5000. I&#8217;ve used both to record meetings but the DS-5000 is far superior to the LS-10, particularly because of the conference setting. It&#8217;s a bit pricey though. Really, anything in the DS series are ideal for meetings. I would recommend the DS-40, 61 or 71</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2008/01/comparison-of-upcoming-digital-audio-recorders.html#comment-521</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=161#comment-521</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[is the LS 10 a good recorder to record meetings? &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;i am looking for one good recorder that has good pick up in a round table]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is the LS 10 a good recorder to record meetings? </p>
<p>i am looking for one good recorder that has good pick up in a round table</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2008/01/comparison-of-upcoming-digital-audio-recorders.html#comment-996</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=161#comment-996</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You are absolutely right. The lack of a simple way to make a high quality mono recording is a key missing element with this otherwise impressive looking recorder. For radio interviews all I often want is quality mono - that way there will be more memory space available. I hope Olympus fixes this issue with a simple software upgrade.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are absolutely right. The lack of a simple way to make a high quality mono recording is a key missing element with this otherwise impressive looking recorder. For radio interviews all I often want is quality mono &#8211; that way there will be more memory space available. I hope Olympus fixes this issue with a simple software upgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2008/01/comparison-of-upcoming-digital-audio-recorders.html#comment-1016</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=161#comment-1016</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I just got an LS-10 and while it is a very good and versatile recorder, it does not offer mono recording. Does anyone know if Olympus plans to update its software to enable mono recording?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got an LS-10 and while it is a very good and versatile recorder, it does not offer mono recording. Does anyone know if Olympus plans to update its software to enable mono recording?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Googoogaagaa		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2008/01/comparison-of-upcoming-digital-audio-recorders.html#comment-1055</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Googoogaagaa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 00:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=161#comment-1055</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;There&#039;s a mistake in the chart: the Tascam DR-1 goes up to 48kHz, not 96.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a mistake in the chart: the Tascam DR-1 goes up to 48kHz, not 96.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brad Linder		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2008/01/comparison-of-upcoming-digital-audio-recorders.html#comment-1061</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad Linder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=161#comment-1061</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Can&#039;t say that I do. On the one hand, the PMD620 is newer, so I&#039;d hope they company will have learned from their mistakes. On the other hand, it&#039;s a cheaper unit than the PMD660 and it&#039;s really aimed at a less pro market.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t say that I do. On the one hand, the PMD620 is newer, so I&#8217;d hope they company will have learned from their mistakes. On the other hand, it&#8217;s a cheaper unit than the PMD660 and it&#8217;s really aimed at a less pro market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Josh		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2008/01/comparison-of-upcoming-digital-audio-recorders.html#comment-1062</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=161#comment-1062</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the info. I was leaning towards the Marantz, even though I wasn&#039;t totally happy with the PMD-660. The Sony was the other unit on my radar.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Do you know the difference between the the 620&#039;s and the 660&#039;s mics and preamps?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Josh]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info. I was leaning towards the Marantz, even though I wasn&#8217;t totally happy with the PMD-660. The Sony was the other unit on my radar.</p>
<p>Do you know the difference between the the 620&#8217;s and the 660&#8217;s mics and preamps?</p>
<p>Josh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brad Linder		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2008/01/comparison-of-upcoming-digital-audio-recorders.html#comment-1063</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad Linder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=161#comment-1063</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s hard to say what the &quot;best&quot; recorder will be in any circumstances, but I&#039;d look at the Sony PCM-D50, the Marantz PMD620, and the Zoom H2. The D50 has excellent preamps for plugging in an external mic, but while the internal mics sound pretty good, they&#039;re extremely sensitive to wind, so you&#039;d probably want to get the optional $50 wind screen, making this the most expensive option.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The Zoom H2 and H4 have pretty good internal mics, but sound pretty bad if you plug in an external mic. If you honestly never expect to plug in an external mic, the H2 might be your best bet. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I haven&#039;t tried the PMD620 myself, but it gets pretty good reviews from many other field recordists.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to say what the &#8220;best&#8221; recorder will be in any circumstances, but I&#8217;d look at the Sony PCM-D50, the Marantz PMD620, and the Zoom H2. The D50 has excellent preamps for plugging in an external mic, but while the internal mics sound pretty good, they&#8217;re extremely sensitive to wind, so you&#8217;d probably want to get the optional $50 wind screen, making this the most expensive option.</p>
<p>The Zoom H2 and H4 have pretty good internal mics, but sound pretty bad if you plug in an external mic. If you honestly never expect to plug in an external mic, the H2 might be your best bet. </p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t tried the PMD620 myself, but it gets pretty good reviews from many other field recordists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2008/01/comparison-of-upcoming-digital-audio-recorders.html#comment-1064</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=161#comment-1064</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I record nature sounds and live music. I owned the PMD-660 and I liked it for nature sounds (pre&#039;s were a bit noisy), but not good for recording a live rehearsal. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;What is the best all around stock unit in the $500 or less range? By all around stock I mean no external mics. light wind will be a factor at times. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thanks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I record nature sounds and live music. I owned the PMD-660 and I liked it for nature sounds (pre&#8217;s were a bit noisy), but not good for recording a live rehearsal. </p>
<p>What is the best all around stock unit in the $500 or less range? By all around stock I mean no external mics. light wind will be a factor at times. </p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: bradlinder.net @ 2025-10-31 11:31:07 by W3 Total Cache
-->