<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Treason and technology	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bradlinder.net/2007/02/treason-and-technology.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bradlinder.net/2007/02/treason-and-technology.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 04:14:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Brad Linder		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2007/02/treason-and-technology.html#comment-1457</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad Linder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 04:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=396#comment-1457</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well, only 8 people have ever been convicted of treason in the US. For a moment I was scared, because the person I&#039;m fact checking the article for had written a note saying that she had read somewhere that it was 40, and that we needed entries on all of them. Turns out that was just a nasty internet rumor.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Apparently it&#039;s really difficult to prove someone guilty of treason, so charges wind up getting dropped in a lot of cases. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;m also only up to the Civil War in this article, I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if the penalty got changed again sometime after 1862.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, only 8 people have ever been convicted of treason in the US. For a moment I was scared, because the person I&#8217;m fact checking the article for had written a note saying that she had read somewhere that it was 40, and that we needed entries on all of them. Turns out that was just a nasty internet rumor.</p>
<p>Apparently it&#8217;s really difficult to prove someone guilty of treason, so charges wind up getting dropped in a lot of cases. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m also only up to the Civil War in this article, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if the penalty got changed again sometime after 1862.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Davis Freeberg		</title>
		<link>https://bradlinder.net/2007/02/treason-and-technology.html#comment-1458</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davis Freeberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 04:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlinder.net/?p=396#comment-1458</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I can understand why they had to change the law during the Civil War, but $10,000 would be still be over $260K in today&#039;s dollars.  That&#039;s a pretty expensive fine to have pay, especially for a bunch of farmers.  It would be interesting to see how many people ended up actually sentenced during and after the Civil War.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand why they had to change the law during the Civil War, but $10,000 would be still be over $260K in today&#8217;s dollars.  That&#8217;s a pretty expensive fine to have pay, especially for a bunch of farmers.  It would be interesting to see how many people ended up actually sentenced during and after the Civil War.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: bradlinder.net @ 2025-10-29 18:18:23 by W3 Total Cache
-->